Attorney General Rob Boda responds to US Supreme Court ruling Bruen

CALIFORNIA (KTXL) – Attorney General Rob Boda talks about the potential repercussions in California following a Supreme Court ruling that limits a state’s ability to limit the use of concealed weapons.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday overturned a New York State law restricting who could obtain a gun license from the public. Under the 1913 law, New Yorkers had to show the proper cause, or real need, to carry a hidden weapon in public for self-defense.

The judges said the law conflicts with the second amendment’s right to bear arms. It provoked a backlash from New York Governor Kathy Hotsul, a Democrat who called the decision reckless and said she was ready to call the legislature again to respond.

“We do not need people to enter our subways, restaurants and cinemas with hidden weapons,” he said. “We do not need other weapons on our streets.”

New York and half a dozen other states with similar laws must now decide their next steps. As with New York, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island all have Democrat-controlled legislatures that could propose measures to ensure that guns are not allowed in some places.

Read More :   What determines the speed of a hydraulic cylinder?

Arms rights groups in these states have vowed to continue to counter what they see as restrictive gun control laws. Some of these cases could eventually reach the country’s highest court. A summary of similar laws in other states, reaction to the Supreme Court ruling and what could happen next:

The court ruling is likely to affect California’s strict licensing laws, said the attorney general of California and gun rights organizations.

Attorney General Rob Boda told California law enforcement in a letter earlier this month that “given a similar California model, the decision could affect California gun laws in public.” He said many aspects of California law may remain untouched despite the ruling.

Nearly two-thirds of California’s 58 counties have already relaxed their secret weapons licensing standards after a team of three U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges overturned the state’s covert transfer model in 2014, said attorney Chuck Michel, president of California . Association of Rifles and Pistols.

Read More :   How to change the background of WhatsApp with your own photo

They maintained the most permissible standards even when a larger court overturned the decision two years later, said Michel, who wrote a book on California’s strict gun laws.

The issue is the pattern used by local officials – usually sheriffs, but sometimes police chiefs – when considering who should be allowed to carry a concealed weapon outside the home. Defenders of gun rights say the court overturning New York law means California must join the 43 states that have what are considered to “issue” standards. These generally require employees to issue licenses unless there is a reason why someone should refuse.

Of California’s 58 counties, 37 already grant licenses if an applicant applies for self-defense. That essentially makes them “will issue” counties, advocates said. The other 21 counties have stricter standards, for example requiring applicants to prove that they have business or occupational risks that justify them being armed.

Read More :   Download Microsoft Office 2021 32 Bit / 64 Bit (Free Download), Free!

The Supreme Court ruling “not only confirms that laws prohibiting licensed public clandestine weapons in self-defense violate the Constitution, but also that the courts apply the wrong approach to assessing the constitutionality of gun control laws,” Michel said. .

Michel’s organization plans to immediately send legal notices to the 21 counties that they must relax their standards in the light of the Supreme Court ruling. It also plans to ask the 9th Circuit to rule on its latest legal dispute over California’s “good faith” model, a decision pending a ruling by the US Supreme Court in the New York case.

Sam Paredes, executive director of Gun Owners of California, said his organization expects to sue California quickly to force it to adopt the standard set out in the New York ruling and to sue local jurisdictions if they do not adopt its ruling. Supreme Court.

The Associated Press contributed to this article.

Related Posts