(NEXSTAR) – Between crime, COVID-19 and the local economy, it is difficult to run a city these days. A recent study tried to quantify who does it well – and who does not.
The WalletHub surveyed the largest cities in California and assessed each city’s credit rating, debt, education ratings, health ratings, crime rates, economy and infrastructure. (See how they weighed each of the 38 criteria in their methodology here.) Each city’s scores in these categories were balanced with its per capita budget. If you have a high budget and lower quality of life, you are at the bottom of the list.
The cities of the Bay region are ranked particularly low. San Francisco earned the worst score in California and the second worst in the country. The only city with the worst national ranking was Washington, DC
While the quality of the city’s services was rated quite high in San Francisco, the city’s large budget and high per capita debt dragged its score down.
Auckland was ranked high for health scores, which included factors such as life expectancy, hospital capacity and deaths from COVID-19. However, the city scored particularly poorly on crime rates and infrastructure issues, ranking it No. 2 of the worst cities in California, according to the analysis.
Long Beach was also dragged down by a poor infrastructure rating, which includes the quality of a city’s roads, hiking capability and average travel time.
Stockton’s poor security rating made it one of the worst cities in California.
One of the largest cities in California, WalletHub found these 10 as the worst:
- San Francisco
- The Angels
- Large beach
The best city in California, according to WalletHub, was Huntington Beach, thanks to its high scores in education, health and safety.
San Diego and Santa Ana also scored high, while Bakersfield and San Jose were in the middle of the pack.